| 攻勢主義-Offensivism http://offensivism.com/phpBB2/ |
|
| bb與bs之爭 http://offensivism.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=150 |
第 1 頁 (共 1 頁) |
| 發表人: | 三眠主義 [ 2009年 1月 8日, 21:51 ] |
| 文章主題 : | bb與bs之爭 |
今天在玩某宇宙網遊~跟其他玩家聊起戰列艦這個問題 有人說戰列艦的簡稱是bs,從字面上來說這樣是應該沒錯,但是歷史上美軍的戰列艦代號是bb,然後那人就問bb的全稱是甚麼,我又說不出來,然後他就斷定bb是一個錯誤的說法,感覺有點無奈... |
|
| 發表人: | welsper [ 2009年 1月 9日, 08:42 ] |
| 文章主題 : | Re: bb與bs之爭 |
源自E文wiki词条“Hull classification symbol”中相关章节： …… [edit] Surface combatant type Surface combatants are ships which are designed primarily to engage enemy forces on the high seas. The primary surface combatants are battleships, cruisers and destroyers. Battleships are very heavily armed and armored; cruisers moderately so; destroyers and smaller warships, less so. Before 1920, ships were called "<type> no. X", with the type fully pronounced. The types were commonly abbreviated in ship lists to "B-X", "C-X", "D-X" et cetera— for example, before 1920, USS Minnesota (BB-22)Template:WP Ships USS instances would have been called "USS Minnesota, Battleship number 22" verbally and "USS Minnesota, B-22" in writing. After 1920, the ship's name would have been both written and pronounced "USS Minnesota (BB-22)". In generally decreasing size, the types are: B: Battleship (pre-1920) BB: Battleship ………… |
|
| 發表人: | DOM [ 2009年 2月 21日, 01:20 ] |
| 文章主題 : | Re: bb與bs之爭 |
[BB]這種分類是美國海軍特有的分類法 但很多人都以為這是世界通用的船艦法則 上篇提供的是英文危機百科的說明 不但囉唆,而且晦澀難懂 簡單來說 這是1920年代訂下的規矩 美國當時的船艦分類簡寫是[種類....用途] 所以BB指的就是[戰列艦....戰鬥用] 但是1930年代後事實上就失去了意義 因為這觀念不能用在航母上 |
|
| 第 1 頁 (共 1 頁) | 所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時 |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|